[CWS] Bump security agent policies to v0.66.1 #36436
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
YoannGh
added
changelog/no-changelog
team/agent-security
category/release_operations
qa/no-code-change
github-actions
bot
added
the
short review
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Size reduction summary
Diff per package
Decision |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: b6c2e2f ❌ Experiments with missing or malformed dataThis is a critical error. No usable optimization goal data was produced by the listed experiments. This may be a result of misconfiguration. Ping #single-machine-performance and we can help out.
Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_traces | memory utilization | +2.53 | [+2.26, +2.81] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics | memory utilization | +0.13 | [+0.08, +0.18] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.11 | [-0.78, +1.00] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.10 | [-0.72, +0.92] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics | memory utilization | +0.10 | [-0.06, +0.25] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | +0.07 | [-0.74, +0.88] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | +0.05 | [-0.83, +0.93] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.04 | [-0.82, +0.90] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.83, +0.88] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.20, +0.23] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.29, +0.30] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.02, +0.02] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.77, +0.77] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -0.06 | [-0.12, -0.00] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.07 | [-0.88, +0.74] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_logs | memory utilization | -0.18 | [-0.33, -0.02] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders | memory utilization | -0.19 | [-0.23, -0.16] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_logs | memory utilization | -0.24 | [-0.29, -0.19] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.37 | [-0.43, -0.30] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.77 | [-0.94, -0.61] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.92 | [-1.03, -0.80] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -2.20 | [-4.94, +0.55] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
Static quality checks✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
|
kacper-murzyn
approved these changes
Apr 25, 2025
|
/merge |
|
View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
The expected merge time in
|
dd-mergequeue
bot
deleted the
yoanngh/backport-bump-secagent-policies-66-7
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Backport the changes from #36435 to the
7.66.xbranchThe policy changes include minor rule fixes. Diff.
Motivation
Describe how you validated your changes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes