Skip to content

Add tests for op_quantize_per_tensor + add checks for quant_min/max #10300

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hsharma35
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: HiFi4's quantize_per_tensor does not consider quant_min/max. Add checks when quant_min/max out of bounds.

Differential Revision: D73268792

@hsharma35 hsharma35 requested a review from tarun292 as a code owner April 18, 2025 18:38
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 18, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10300

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure

As of commit 84c894f with merge base c053712 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Apr 18, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73268792

hsharma35 added a commit to hsharma35/executorch that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2025
…ytorch#10300)

Summary:

HiFi4's quantize_per_tensor does not consider quant_min/max. Add checks when quant_min/max out of bounds.

Differential Revision: D73268792
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73268792

hsharma35 added a commit to hsharma35/executorch that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2025
…ytorch#10300)

Summary:

HiFi4's quantize_per_tensor does not consider quant_min/max. Add checks when quant_min/max out of bounds.

Differential Revision: D73268792
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73268792

hsharma35 added a commit to hsharma35/executorch that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2025
…ytorch#10300)

Summary:

HiFi4's quantize_per_tensor does not consider quant_min/max. Add checks when quant_min/max out of bounds.

Reviewed By: mcremon-meta

Differential Revision: D73268792
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73268792

@hsharma35 hsharma35 requested a review from mcremon-meta April 19, 2025 18:19
hsharma35 added a commit to hsharma35/executorch that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2025
…ytorch#10300)

Summary:

HiFi4's quantize_per_tensor does not consider quant_min/max. Add checks when quant_min/max out of bounds.

Reviewed By: mcremon-meta

Differential Revision: D73268792
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73268792

hsharma35 added a commit to hsharma35/executorch that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2025
…ytorch#10300)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10300

HiFi4's quantize_per_tensor does not consider quant_min/max. Add checks when quant_min/max out of bounds.

Reviewed By: mcremon-meta

Differential Revision: D73268792
…ytorch#10300)

Summary:

HiFi4's quantize_per_tensor does not consider quant_min/max. Add checks when quant_min/max out of bounds.

Reviewed By: mcremon-meta

Differential Revision: D73268792
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73268792

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported topic: not user facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants